Literary Analysis Essay Example

Posted on

Literary Analysis Essay Example: Huckleberry Finn

Essays on literature are one of the most commonly assigned papers among college and university students. We posted this literary analysis essay example analysing one of the most morally complex heroes. Our writer selected Huckleberry Finn to speak about in the following moral criticism essay example.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn depicts a strong character with powerful moral beliefs. If you need to write a paper about morality, this moralist approach example essay may be a source of great ideas. In the text, you will find out how the writer has approached Huckleberry’s values and whether the outside world has influenced his morality. You can look through the works cited in this literary analysis example to find more information from original sources for your own paper.

In case you need another character to analyze for your literature class, you are welcome to ask our experts to help you. Just tell your topic and your paper will be delivered as soon as you need it.

Enjoy reading one more literary analytical essay example.

Example of a Literary Analysis Essay: Moral Values and Morality in Huckleberry Finn

The history of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is famous and well-known in the world. It must be clear that, as any high-quality story, it must have some sense of morality to it. It is important that the story still stays interesting for researchers to study. One can notice that they are interested not only in the main moral of the whole story but more about the morality of the main character. The case of Huckleberry Finn seems to be quite interesting, taking into account the factors that have an impact on him. Reading the story, it is apparent that Huckleberry is surrounded by the common morality of his time and environment. However, when it is time to act in some way, Huckleberry Finn behaves in the way that seems to be right for him and modern readers, not for the sources of common morals that could affect him. In this way, considering the sources of Huckleberry’s morality, the reader can notice not only different external sources but also his feelings about right and wrong.

Considering the moral values and the source of morality for Huckleberry Finn, Schinkel, who cited Copeland, writes that “whereas Miss Watson tries to get Huck to behave by telling him ‘all about the bad place,’ the widow, in a more Stoic frame of mind, teaches Huck to pray for ‘spiritual gifts,’ which means, as Huck says, ‘I must help other people, and do everything I could for other people, and look out for them all the time, and never think about myself’ [. . .]” (516). Considering the following behavior of Huckleberry Finn, it is clear that the widow’s morale had more impact on him. Huckleberry’s representations of morals, even though they were not strictly formulated, were closer to the widow’s morals. At least he agreed with the idea of helping other people, particularly his friends and people who were kind to him. Independence is an important feature of Huckleberry Finn. However, he, like any other person, can not avoid the impact of environmental factors. Thus, he can accept or ignore the morals which Miss Watson and the widow tried to instill in him. However, beyond these two women, there is one more source of morality that had an impact on Huckleberry Finn.

One of the main points related to the morals of Huckleberry Finn is his interaction with his friend, the fugitive black slave Jim. In this relationship, the morality of Huckleberry Finn becomes clear. On the one hand, “in his earliest years, Huck wasn’t taught any principles, and the only ones he has encountered since then are those of rural Missouri, in which slave-owning is just one kind of ownership and is not subject to critical pressure” (Bennett). In this way, whether he accepts it or not, the environment has an impact on Huckleberry. On the other hand, Huck allows Jim to escape and helps him on their following travels. This fact clearly shows that beyond the common rural Missouri morality, Huckleberry has another one that makes him act the way he does in helping Jim.

Considering the moral issue of Huckleberry Finn, Schinkel wrote that “Huck somehow has to deal with two alternately dominant manifestations of the concerned awareness we call conscience” (515). The researcher pays attention to the fact that “one of them is articulate, taking its standard from conventional morality; the other is mute and has no articulable standard to go by – Huck cannot articulate any standard on this side, because the whole of his moral vocabulary is in service of the first” (Schinkel 515). In this way, the researcher emphasizes and shows the issue of two different morals that Huckleberry has. On the one hand, he has the morality that society and certain people tried to instill in him. On the other hand, Huckleberry has his own morals, his own feeling about right and wrong behavior and actions. What is more important, even the second type is not articulable; this type of morality, not the first one, makes Huckleberry act in the way he does and helps Jim. In this way, considering sources of Huckleberry’s morality, one can consider not only the different external sources such as society in general or particular people who have impact on Huckleberry but also his feelings about right and wrong.

In this way, there are different sources of Huckleberry’s morality. There are two women, Miss Watson and the widow, who tried to instill in him their own morals. One more source is the common morality of his time, which can impact Huckleberry from the different people and different sources, but he could not avoid it. However, the actions of Huckleberry are not caused by any of those morals. Thus, the sources of Huckleberry’s morality can be separated into external and internal. The inner feelings and understanding of right and wrong is the most important for Huckleberry and causes his behavior, not the common morality of his time or the people who tried to instill their morality in him.

Works Cited

Bennett, Jonathan. “The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn.” Philosophy, vol. 49, no. 188, 1974, pp. 123–134.
Schinkel, Anders. “Huck Finn, Moral Language and Moral Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol 45, no. 3, 2011, pp. 511-525.


arrow